The Fall of the Sikh Empire: Knives at Lahore, Two Anglo-Sikh Wars and the Boy Who Signed Punjab Away
Ten years after Ranjit Singh died, his empire was gone. Princes and ministers murdered at Lahore, an army that ran itself by committee, a queen the British feared, two wars the Khalsa came close to winning, commanders accused of selling them, Kashmir sold for 75 lakh and a ten-year-old who signed it all away. The British case and the Punjabi case, each at full strength.
In short
- After Ranjit Singh died in 1839, two Maharajas, an heir, a regent and three wazirs of the Lahore court died violently or suspiciously within six years, and the Khalsa army, run by elected regimental committees, became the real power.
- The First Anglo-Sikh War began when the Khalsa crossed the Sutlej on 11 December 1845. The Sikhs nearly won at Ferozeshah, then lost 8,000 to 10,000 men at Sobraon on 10 February 1846. Sikh historians, and one British officer who was there, blamed their own wazir Lal Singh and commander Tej Singh.
- The peace took the Jullundur Doab and a huge indemnity; Kashmir was sold to Gulab Singh for 75 lakh rupees. A British Resident ran Lahore from December 1846, and Maharani Jind Kaur was locked up and exiled.
- A revolt at Multan in April 1848 became a second war. The Sikhs fought the British to a standstill at Chillianwala and were beaten at Gujrat. Lord Dalhousie annexed Punjab on 29 March 1849; British critics called it a guardian punishing his own ward.
- Duleep Singh became a Christian at 14, lived as an English squire, returned to the Sikh faith at Aden in 1886 and died in Paris in 1893. He is buried in Suffolk, and some want him brought home.
At a glance
1839–1849- When
- From Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s death on 27 June 1839 to the annexation of Punjab on 29 March 1849
- Killed at the top
- Maharaja Sher Singh and his son Partap Singh, the wazir Dhian Singh (all 15 September 1843); Rani Chand Kaur (1842); the wazirs Hira Singh (21 December 1844) and Jawahar Singh (21 September 1845); Kanwar Pashaura Singh (11 September 1845)
- First war
- 11 December 1845 to 9 March 1846: Mudki (18 Dec), Ferozeshah (21–22 Dec), Aliwal (28 Jan), Sobraon (10 Feb)
- Second war
- April 1848 to March 1849: Multan, Ramnagar (22 Nov 1848), Chillianwala (13 Jan 1849), Gujrat (21 Feb 1849); surrender near Rawalpindi on 12 March 1849
- Heaviest day
- Sobraon: 8,000 to 10,000 Sikh soldiers killed, many drowned when the bridge of boats behind them gave way
- Kashmir
- Sold by the British to Gulab Singh of Jammu for 75 lakh Nanakshahi rupees under the Treaty of Amritsar, 16 March 1846
- Accused
- The wazir Lal Singh and the commander Tej Singh, charged by Sikh historians and by the British officer J.D. Cunningham with betraying their own army; the charge is still argued
- The end
- Duleep Singh, 10, signed the terms at Lahore Fort on 29 March 1849; the Koh-i-Noor went to Queen Victoria
In this story · 17 parts
- 21 Sep 1845The boy on the elephant
- 1839–1845A throne with knives around it
- 1841–1845An army with a vote
- 11–18 Dec 1845Across the Sutlej
- 21–22 Dec 1845The longest night
- 10 Feb 1846White horse, white clothes
- 1845–1849Traitors?
- 16 Mar 1846Kashmir for 75 lakh
- 1847–1849The queen in the tower
- Apr 1848Two dead men at Multan
- 13 Jan 1849Chillianwala
- 21 Feb 1849The battle of the guns
- 29 Mar 1849Twenty-ninth of March
- 1853–1893From Fatehgarh to Aden
- 1846–1857Who sang for the Khalsa
- 1839–1893Ten years, step by step
- Part 17Our take
The boy on the elephant
Lahore Fort
Lahore, 21 September 1845. An elephant walks slowly towards the massed regiments of the Khalsa army camped outside the city. In the howdah sits the wazir, Jawahar Singh. On his lap, held tight, is his nephew: Duleep Singh, Maharaja of Punjab, seven years old.
Jawahar Singh knows why he has been summoned. Ten days earlier a son of Ranjit Singh, Kanwar Pashaura Singh, was strangled in Attock fort after surrendering on a promise of safe passage, and the army blames the wazir. He is betting that no soldier of the Khalsa will strike at a man holding the Maharaja.
He loses the bet. Soldiers press around the elephant, lift the boy out of his arms and carry him to his mother. Then they bayonet Jawahar Singh, drag him down and spear him to death. His sister, Maharani Jind Kaur, sees it happen.
Six years earlier, Maharaja Ranjit Singh had died master of an empire from the Khyber to the Sutlej; we told his story in Maharaja Ranjit Singh and the Koh-i-Noor. This is what came after: a court that devoured its own, an army run by committee, two wars the Sikh soldiers nearly won, the commanders accused of throwing them away, a queen her enemies feared, and a boy who signed away his kingdom at ten.
A throne with knives around it
Lahore Fort On the History of the Sikhs timeline →
Shah Bilawal, outside Lahore, 15 September 1843. Maharaja Sher Singh, a son of Ranjit Singh, is shown a new shotgun by his kinsman, Ajit Singh Sandhawalia. By the most common account, Sandhawalia raises it and fires, then finishes the wounded Maharaja with his sword. Sher Singh’s young son, Partap Singh, is cut down soon after. Before the day is out, the prime minister, Dhian Singh, is dead too.
Lahore was used to funerals by then. Ranjit Singh’s heir, Kharak Singh, had died in November 1840 amid talk of poison; his son Nau Nihal Singh was crushed by falling masonry the same day. Kharak Singh’s widow, Chand Kaur, lost the fort to Sher Singh in January 1841 and was beaten to death by her maids in 1842.
Dhian Singh’s son, Hira Singh, took revenge within hours. He went to the army, promised more pay, and led the regiments against the fort, where the Sandhawalias died. In mid-September 1843 the army proclaimed a new Maharaja: Duleep Singh, Ranjit Singh’s youngest son, five years old. His mother, Jind Kaur, became regent; Hira Singh became wazir.
Hira Singh lasted 15 months, leaning on a sharp-tongued Brahmin adviser, Pandit Jalla, who insulted the Sikh chiefs and the Maharani alike. On 21 December 1844 the two fled Lahore; Khalsa soldiers, led by several accounts by Sham Singh Attariwala and Jawahar Singh, caught and killed them. Jawahar Singh, the queen’s brother, became wazir.
Who’s who
- Maharani Jind Kaurabout 28 in 1845Ranjit Singh’s youngest queen; regent from 1843
- Maharaja Duleep Singh7 in 1845the boy king
- Lal Singhtreasury clerk turned wazir, November 1845
- Tej Singhcommander-in-chief of the Khalsa army
- Gulab SinghRaja of Jammu, Dhian Singh’s brother
- Hardinge, Gough, Henry Lawrence and Dalhousiethe British Governor-General, his commander, the Resident at Lahore and the next Governor-General
An army with a vote
Lahore Fort
Lahore cantonment, the early 1840s. In regiment after regiment of the Khalsa, the soldiers have chosen their own panch, committees of five. The panches decide which officers to obey, which minister to back and what to demand from the treasury.
The army had grown from about 29,000 regulars in 1839 to more than 80,000 men by 1845, by one count. Every faction at court bought its support with pay it could not afford. British observers called it a dangerous military democracy.
The soldiers saw it differently. To them they were the Khalsa itself, the Panth in arms, guarding Ranjit Singh’s son against Dogra ministers who had grown rich, and against the British watching from across the river. They were not wrong about either.
Into this stepped Jind Kaur, daughter of the man who kept Ranjit Singh’s kennels and mother of his last son. As regent she cast off her veil, held court in public, reviewed the troops and went straight to the regimental committees.
Who is the real sovereign, Duleep Singh or Hira Singh?Maharani Jind Kaur to the army’s regimental committees, 1844, as recorded by the historian B.J. Hasrat in the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism
British writers painted her as a schemer and gossiped about her private life. Sikh writers see a widow of 27 fighting for her child’s throne in a court full of killers. By 1845 she and the army were the two powers left in Lahore, and they did not trust each other.
Across the Sutlej
Mudki
The Sutlej, 11 December 1845. For 36 years, since the Treaty of Amritsar of 1809, this river has been the line between Ranjit Singh’s empire and the East India Company. On this day, regiments of the Khalsa army begin to cross it, near Ferozepur.
The Sikhs said they were moving into their own land, around the village of Moran, which Lahore claimed. The Governor-General, Sir Henry Hardinge, called it an invasion and declared war on 13 December. Who really started the war has been argued ever since.
Who started the war?
The British case
- The Khalsa crossed first, into land under British protection, breaking a frontier the Company had respected since 1809.
- Lahore had no government able to control its army, which had just murdered a second wazir in a year.
- Hardinge’s government said its troops on the Sutlej were there for defence, and after the war it chose not to annex Punjab.
The Sikh and Punjabi case
- The Company had seized Sindh in 1843 and was massing troops, siege guns and bridging boats at Ferozepur.
- J.D. Cunningham, a British officer who served in the war, wrote that British policy made war nearly inevitable.
- Sikh historians say Lal Singh and Tej Singh pushed the army over the river hoping the British would destroy it.
Tej Singh’s force reached Ferozepur, where the British garrison lay exposed, and did not attack it. Lal Singh’s men met Gough and Hardinge at Mudki late on 18 December in a confused evening battle fought in clouds of dust. The British held the field; among their dead was Sir Robert Sale, a hero of their Afghan war.
The longest night
Ferozeshah
Ferozeshah, 21 December 1845. The Khalsa is dug in behind earthworks with around a hundred guns. Hardinge had made Gough wait two days for the Ferozepur garrison, and when the attack finally goes in there are only a few hours of daylight left.
The Sikh gunners are superb. British and Indian infantry walk into the fire and fall in rows; the Company would count 694 killed and 1,721 wounded. By nightfall some British units are inside the Sikh lines and others have been thrown back.
Hardinge thought he would lose. He sent word that the state papers in his baggage were to be burned if the day went against them, and handed his sword, a trophy once owned by Napoleon, to an aide. The ammunition was nearly gone.
In the morning the British took the rest of the entrenchments; Lal Singh made no attempt to rally his men. Then a second Sikh army appeared from the west, Tej Singh’s, fresh, with its own guns. They opened fire on the exhausted British, and officers seriously discussed surrender.
What saved Gough was a mistake. A staff officer sent some horse artillery back to Ferozepur for ammunition, with much of the cavalry as escort. Tej Singh read the movement as an attempt to outflank him, and ordered his army to withdraw.
White horse, white clothes
Sobraon, on the Sutlej On the History of the Sikhs timeline →
In January the Sikhs struck again upstream. Ranjodh Singh Majithia burned part of the Ludhiana cantonment, but at Aliwal on 28 January 1846 Sir Harry Smith caught him and took almost all his guns.
Sobraon, 10 February 1846. The Khalsa holds a great bridgehead on the left bank, with its back to the river and a bridge of boats behind it. Sikh tradition says the old general Sham Singh Attariwala made an ardas before the Guru Granth Sahib and vowed to come back victorious or not at all; it remembers him riding a white mare, dressed in white. Jind Kaur had sent word urging the officers to fight on.
Fog delayed the British guns; when it lifted, 35 heavy guns and howitzers pounded the Sikh lines for two hours. Gough, told the ammunition was running short, is said to have answered that he would be at them with the bayonet. The breakthrough came on the sandy Sikh right, where General Robert Dick was killed leading his division in.
Tej Singh left the field early. Then the bridge broke, trapping thousands of Sikh soldiers on the British side of a swollen river. Sikh accounts say Tej Singh had weakened it; British accounts blame the flood and the crush of men. Sham Singh died fighting with his men. Between 8,000 and 10,000 Sikh soldiers were killed, many in the water.
Gough, who had ordered the attack, wrote later that he could have wept at the slaughter of so devoted a body of men, and that policy stopped him praising a fallen foe in public. Sham Singh’s samadh at Attari, by the Wagah border, is still a place of pilgrimage.
Traitors?
Sobraon, on the Sutlej On the History of Punjab timeline →
Bhopal, 1849. A British captain, Joseph Davey Cunningham, publishes A History of the Sikhs. He had been with Harry Smith at Aliwal and an extra aide-de-camp to Hardinge at Sobraon. His verdict: the British could have lost, and were helped by treachery, with Lal Singh, Tej Singh and Gulab Singh betraying their own army to different degrees.
Hardinge was furious. Cunningham was removed from his political post and sent back to regimental duty, and died at Ambala in 1851, still in his thirties. His book is now a standard work. The charge he wrote down has never gone away.
Lal Singh was passing secrets to the British
Why people believed it
Sikh historians have said so since the war.
What the record shows
The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism says he sent military information to Captain Peter Nicholson, the British agent at Ferozepur; historians including Khushwant Singh cite his letters from Nicholson’s papers. One story says he even sent a map of the Sikh lines; no map has been produced.
On the recordContact with the enemy is well attested. How much it decided is argued; the map is unproven.
Tej Singh broke the bridge at Sobraon
Why people believed it
Sikh accounts say he weakened it, or had his guns fire on it, as he left.
What the record shows
British accounts say the swollen river and the crush of men broke it. That he left the field early is not disputed.
UnprovenUnproven either way.
The Sikhs lost only because of treachery
Why people believed it
The version told most often in Punjab.
What the record shows
The British had heavier guns, more reserves and one command. In 1849, under commanders nobody accuses, the Khalsa fought brilliantly and still lost.
BustedToo simple. Treachery cost the Khalsa dearly in 1845–46, but it was not the only reason.
Lal Singh and Tej Singh: both cases
The case against them
- Cunningham, a British officer at Sobraon, named both, and lost his career for it.
- Lal Singh was in touch with a British political officer during the war.
- Tej Singh left a winning position at Ferozeshah and left Sobraon early; Lal Singh kept the elite cavalry off the field at Ferozeshah.
- The British favoured both afterwards.
The case in their defence
- Lal Singh was a palace official, not a soldier; fear and incompetence can look like treachery.
- Tej Singh pulled back at Ferozeshah after a real British movement he took for a flanking attack.
- The regimental panchayats trusted no officer, so no general had full command.
Readers’ poll
Lal Singh and Tej Singh: what is your verdict?
Tap an answer to see what other readers think.
Kashmir for 75 lakh
Amritsar On the History of India timeline →
Amritsar, 16 March 1846. Gulab Singh, Raja of Jammu, signs a treaty with two British officers, Frederick Currie and Henry Lawrence. For 75 lakh Nanakshahi rupees, the hill country between the Indus and the Ravi, Kashmir included, becomes his. Every year he is to send the British one horse, twelve shawl goats and three pairs of Kashmiri shawls, as a token of their supremacy.
A week earlier, the Treaty of Lahore of 9 March 1846 had set the price of defeat: the Jullundur Doab, an army cut to about 20,000 infantry and 12,000 cavalry, and 1.5 crore rupees. The treasury could not pay, so it handed over Kashmir and Hazara instead.
Gulab Singh, Dhian Singh’s brother, had stayed out of the fighting, then come to Lahore after Sobraon and negotiated the peace as wazir. To the British he was a sensible man who had earned his reward. To many Sikhs he was the third traitor.
Lal Singh had his own ideas. When Lahore’s governor of Kashmir, Sheikh Imamuddin, refused to hand the valley over, letters showed Lal Singh had told him to resist. A British court of inquiry found him guilty in December 1846, and he was exiled; he died at Dehradun in 1866.
That month the Treaty of Bhyrowal finished the job. A British Resident, Henry Lawrence, would run Lahore through a regency council until Duleep Singh turned 16, and the Maharani was pensioned off. The Sikh state still had a king and a flag, but no government of its own.
Gulab Singh: three views
His defenders
- He bought Kashmir by treaty and paid; the British saw a fair reward for staying out of the war and brokering peace.
- His family ruled Jammu and Kashmir for a century, until 1947.
His Sikh critics
- Cunningham named him among the leaders who betrayed the Khalsa.
- He took the richest province of Ranjit Singh’s empire, at a fraction of its worth.
His Kashmiri critics
- In 1946 Sheikh Abdullah’s Quit Kashmir campaign attacked the treaty as a sale deed.
- The people of the valley, they say, were sold with the land.
Readers’ poll
How should Gulab Singh’s purchase of Kashmir be remembered?
Tap an answer to see what other readers think.
The queen in the tower
Chunar Fort On the History of the Sikhs timeline →
Lahore Fort, August 1847. The Resident has arranged a ceremony to make Tej Singh Raja of Sialkot, and the Maharaja is to perform the ceremony. Duleep Singh, nine in a month, refuses. Henry Lawrence blamed the boy’s mother.
Jind Kaur was locked in the fort’s Samman Burj, then sent to Sheikhupura, her pension cut from 1.5 lakh to 48,000 rupees. In 1848 the next Resident, Frederick Currie, sent her far away to Chunar Fort on the Ganges and took her jewels.
On 18 April 1849 she walked out of Chunar dressed as a servant. Eleven days later she reached Kathmandu, with almost nothing, and Nepal gave her refuge. Her British captors had already paid her the highest compliment they knew.
She has the only manly understanding in the Punjab.Lord Dalhousie, in a letter to Brigadier Armine Mountain, 31 January 1849
On 16 January 1861 she was allowed to meet her son at Spence’s Hotel in Calcutta, and went with him to England. She died in Kensington on 1 August 1863. One of her last wishes, as Khushwant Singh records it, was not to let her bones rot in that inhospitable country. Her body was taken back to India and cremated.
Two dead men at Multan
Multan
Multan, April 1848. The governor, Diwan Mulraj, has resigned rather than meet the new government’s demands. On 18 April two British officers, Patrick Vans Agnew and Lieutenant William Anderson, arrive with his successor, Sardar Kahan Singh. Mulraj’s soldiers and a city crowd attack them, their escort goes over, and within a day or two both officers are dead.
Whether Mulraj planned it or was swept along by his men is still argued. A young officer at Bannu, Herbert Edwardes, raised Pathan levies and, with troops from Bahawalpur, beat Mulraj’s men in June and July and shut them inside Multan.
Dalhousie, Governor-General since January, did not send the main army until the cool season. His critics say he let the fire spread on purpose. On 15 August 1848, in a private letter, he wrote that annexing Punjab was the most advantageous policy for Britain.
Then the north rose. Chattar Singh Attariwala, governor of Hazara, rebelled in August; by accounts of that killing, he was the man who had Pashaura Singh strangled at Attock. On 14 September his son, Raja Sher Singh Attariwala, sent with Lahore troops to help the British at Multan, joined the revolt. Afghan horsemen came east, and at Ramnagar on 22 November the Sikhs threw back a British cavalry charge.
Chillianwala
Chillianwala
Near the Jhelum, 13 January 1849. Once again Gough attacks late in the day, through thick jungle that hides the Sikh guns. The 24th Foot charges through scrub and water straight at them and is shot to pieces. Its brigadier, John Pennycuick, is killed, and so is his son. The regiment’s Queen’s colour is lost.
On the right, after a confused order, the 14th Light Dragoons gallop to the rear. By dark the British hold the field and little else: 602 killed, 1,651 wounded and 104 missing by their own count, and four guns lost. The Sikhs lost 12 guns and, by an unreliable estimate, 4,000 to 8,000 men. That night Sikh irregulars killed many British wounded left in the scrub.
As plucky as lions.A British observer, describing the Sikh soldiers at Chillianwala, January 1849
Three days of rain followed and both armies drew back, each claiming victory. Historians including Khushwant Singh and J.S. Grewal call it a British defeat. London replaced Gough with Sir Charles Napier, and Dalhousie called Gough’s claim of victory ‘poetical’. Years later, after the Charge of the Light Brigade, a British general would say it was nothing to Chillianwala.
The battle of the guns
Gujrat
Multan fell first. British troops stormed the city on 2 January 1849 and Mulraj gave up the citadel on 22 January. He was tried by the British and spent the rest of his short life a prisoner.
Gujrat, 21 February 1849. This time Gough did not rush. Nearly a hundred guns pounded the Sikh lines for three hours before the infantry moved, and cavalry chased the broken army for four hours more. The Sikhs lost 3,000 to 5,000 men and 53 guns; the British, 96 killed and 700 wounded.
On 12 March 1849, near Rawalpindi, Chattar Singh and Sher Singh Attariwala surrendered to Sir Walter Gilbert, and about 20,000 men laid down their arms. The Afghans fell back through Attock and Peshawar. The Khalsa army was finished.
Twenty-ninth of March
Lahore Fort On the History of Punjab timeline →
Lahore Fort, 29 March 1849, early morning. The day before, the Foreign Secretary, Henry Elliot, told the regency council that resistance would be a mistake. Now a ten-year-old boy is asked to sign, and he signs. Elliot reads out Dalhousie’s proclamation, which blames the Sikhs for breaking their agreements.
Under the terms, Duleep Singh kept his title and a pension, the state’s property went to the Company, and the Koh-i-Noor went to the Queen of England (that story is told here). Dalhousie acted without waiting for authority from London.
Some of the sharpest objections came from the British themselves. Henry Lawrence, who had been the boy’s guardian as Resident, called the annexation and deposition unjust and impolitic. John Sullivan, a member of the Madras Council, put it in one line.
A guardian has visited his own misdeeds upon his ward.John Sullivan, in his pamphlet Are We Bound by Our Treaties?, on the annexation of Punjab
Was the annexation fair?
The British case for annexation
- Two British officers on the Lahore government’s business were murdered at Multan, and the killers went unpunished, Dalhousie argued.
- The Darbar’s own sardars raised the second war, with Afghan help; his proclamation said the Sikhs had broken their agreements.
- After six years of murders and two wars, Lahore could not keep order; annexation would spare Punjab more war.
- Defenders of British rule point to roads, canals, a disarmed province and a quiet Punjab in 1857.
The Sikh and Punjabi case against it
- Since 1846 the British Resident had run Lahore; a rising against his rule cannot be pinned on the boy he was guarding.
- The Treaty of Bhyrowal bound Britain to protect the Maharaja until 1854; the regency council saw it broken.
- Dalhousie wanted annexation by August 1848 and, critics say, let the revolt spread to get it.
Readers’ poll
Was the British annexation of Punjab in 1849 justified?
Tap an answer to see what other readers think.
From Fatehgarh to Aden
Fatehgarh, 8 March 1853. The boy who signed is 14, living far from Punjab with his guardian, Dr John Login, who treats him as a son. In a private ceremony he is baptised a Christian, hailed by his new masters as the first Indian prince to join their church.
He sailed for England in 1854, became a favourite of Queen Victoria and lived as a Suffolk squire. Then came the reunion with his mother, and later his cousin Thakur Singh Sandhanwalia, who told him who he had been.
I particularly desire to be rebaptized into the faith of my ancestors.Maharaja Duleep Singh, letter to the Secretary of State for India, 1886, as given in the Encyclopaedia of Sikhism
The British would not let him reach India. They stopped him at Aden, and there, on 25 May 1886, five Sikhs, among them his cousin Thakur Singh, gave him amrit. He spent his last years trying to win Punjab back, even from the Tsar’s Russia, and died in a Paris hotel on 22 October 1893. He is buried at Elveden in Suffolk.
Some want him home. In 2017 Lord Rana and the Southall MP Virendra Sharma backed returning his remains for Sikh rites; Amandeep Singh Madra of the UK Punjab Heritage Association pointed to a will in which, he said, Duleep Singh asked to be buried where he died.
Readers’ poll
Should Maharaja Duleep Singh’s remains be brought from Elveden to Punjab?
Tap an answer to see what other readers think.
Who sang for the Khalsa
A village near Amritsar, about 1846. A Muslim poet, Shah Muhammad, writes the war in Punjabi verse. He calls it the war of Hind and Punjab, not an Anglo-Sikh war. He mourns the Khalsa’s dead, remembers the Lahore court as a time when Punjabis of every faith lived together, and blames the chiefs, not the soldiers.
Shah Muhammada, ikk sarkar bajhon, faujan jitt ke ant nu haariyan ne.Shah Muhammad, Jangnama (‘Without one government, the armies won, and in the end they lost’)
That is Punjab’s memory: an army of Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims betrayed by those who should have led it. The British memory is of their dead at Ferozeshah and Chillianwala, and of an enemy they came to respect.
Both are true. The Sikh gunners at Ferozeshah, Sham Singh’s last stand, the 24th Foot walking into fire at Chillianwala, the Company’s sepoys who fought and died beside the redcoats: courage was not short on either side.
Eight years later, in 1857, Sikh and Punjabi soldiers helped the British retake Delhi (see the Revolt of 1857), and the Khalsa’s fighting name passed into the British army, all the way to Saragarhi.
Ten years, step by step
From the Lion’s death to the last Maharaja’s
- 27 Jun 1839Ranjit Singh dies.
- 1840–1843Kharak Singh, Nau Nihal Singh, Chand Kaur and Sher Singh die in turn.
- Sep 1843Duleep Singh, 5, proclaimed Maharaja.
- 21 Sep 1845The army kills the wazir Jawahar Singh.
- 11 Dec 1845The Khalsa crosses the Sutlej.
- 18–22 Dec 1845Mudki and Ferozeshah.
- 10 Feb 1846Sobraon.
- Mar 1846Treaties of Lahore and Amritsar; Kashmir sold.
- Aug 1847Jind Kaur imprisoned.
- Apr 1848Two British officers killed at Multan.
- 13 Jan 1849Chillianwala.
- 21 Feb 1849Gujrat.
- 29 Mar 1849Punjab annexed.
- 25 May 1886Duleep Singh returns to the Sikh faith.
- 22 Oct 1893He dies in Paris.
Our take
Lahore Fort
The Sikh Empire was not conquered in a day at Sobraon. It began dying in 1839, in the rooms of Lahore Fort, when the men around Ranjit Singh’s heirs decided that killing each other was easier than governing together. By the time the British crossed the Sutlej, Lahore had a boy king, a regent its ministers despised and an army that trusted nobody.
That army deserved better. It nearly won the first war at Ferozeshah and fought the second to a standstill at Chillianwala. The record strongly suggests some of its own leaders sold it out; paid agents or frightened, selfish men, the soldiers paid either way.
The British case deserves its hearing too. The Khalsa crossed the river first, two British officers were murdered at Multan, and Hardinge did not annex when he could have. But Dalhousie did, against the treaty that made Britain the boy’s protector, and some of his own officials said so at the time.
Remember Jind Kaur, locked away for refusing to be quiet, and Shah Muhammad, a Muslim poet weeping for a Sikh army. Punjab lost an empire in those ten years. It did not lose its honour, and neither, in the field, did its enemies.
Test yourself
8 questions on this story
-
Which British officer wrote that Lal Singh, Tej Singh and Gulab Singh had betrayed the Sikh army, and lost his political post for it?
Cunningham, who was at Aliwal and Sobraon, published his History of the Sikhs in 1849 and was sent back to regimental duty.
-
What did Gulab Singh pay the British for Kashmir in 1846?
The Treaty of Amritsar fixed 75 lakh, plus a yearly token of a horse, twelve shawl goats and three pairs of shawls.
-
Which general rode out at Sobraon vowing to win or not return, and is remembered at a samadh in Attari?
Sham Singh Attariwala died fighting at Sobraon on 10 February 1846.
-
What set off the second Anglo-Sikh war in April 1848?
Patrick Vans Agnew and William Anderson were attacked and killed at Multan, and the governor, Diwan Mulraj, rose in revolt.
-
At which battle did the 24th Foot lose its colours?
The regiment charged through jungle into the Sikh guns on 13 January 1849 and was shattered.
-
Whom did Lord Dalhousie credit with ‘the only manly understanding in the Punjab’?
He wrote it of the Maharani in January 1849, while he held her prisoner.
-
Where did Duleep Singh take amrit and return to the Sikh faith in 1886?
The British stopped him at Aden on his way to India; he took amrit there on 25 May 1886.
-
Who wrote the Jangnama, the Punjabi ballad of the first Anglo-Sikh war?
Shah Muhammad, a Muslim poet of the Amritsar area, wrote it around 1846.
Play: which came first?
Two moments from this story. Tap the one that happened first.
Questions people ask
Why did the Sikh Empire fall so quickly after Ranjit Singh?
He left no strong heir and no system that could outlast him. Between 1839 and 1845 his successors and their ministers were killed one after another, the unpaid army took power through elected committees, and the British, massed on the Sutlej, were ready to take advantage. Sikh historians add that the court’s own commanders betrayed the army in the first war.
Did Lal Singh and Tej Singh betray the Sikh army?
Many Sikh historians say so, and so did a British officer who served in the war, Joseph Davey Cunningham, who lost his post after writing it. Lal Singh is recorded as being in contact with a British political officer during the war, and Tej Singh withdrew a fresh army at Ferozeshah and left Sobraon early. Others argue they were self-serving and incompetent rather than paid agents. The question is still argued.
How did Gulab Singh get Kashmir?
The Treaty of Lahore (9 March 1846) demanded 1.5 crore rupees from the Lahore state. It could not pay, so it gave up the hill country including Kashmir. A week later, under the Treaty of Amritsar (16 March 1846), the British sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh of Jammu for 75 lakh Nanakshahi rupees.
Was Chillianwala a British defeat?
Both sides claimed it. The British held the field but lost about 2,350 men killed, wounded and missing, the colours of three regiments and four guns, and their commander was replaced. Historians such as Khushwant Singh and J.S. Grewal call it a British defeat.
When was Punjab annexed?
On 29 March 1849, at a durbar in Lahore Fort, ten-year-old Maharaja Duleep Singh signed the terms and Lord Dalhousie’s proclamation was read out. Some reference works give 2 April 1849 for the formal proclamation.
Where is Maharaja Duleep Singh buried?
At Elveden church in Suffolk, England, beside two of his sons. He died in Paris on 22 October 1893. Some British Sikhs and politicians want his remains returned to Punjab; others point to his will, which they say asked for burial where he died.
How we wrote this. Researched from the reference works, books, museum records and newspaper articles listed below, and written in our own words by the TrendingPunjabi desk with the help of an AI model. Where sources disagree we say so: the date Duleep Singh was proclaimed (16 or 18 September 1843), the size of the Khalsa army in 1845, the exact day the two officers died at Multan (19 or 20 April 1848), Sikh losses at Chillianwala, the date of the formal annexation proclamation (29 March or 2 April 1849), whether Lal Singh’s map went to the British before Ferozeshah or Sobraon, and whether Tej Singh broke the bridge at Sobraon. Whether Lal Singh and Tej Singh were traitors is argued, and we give both cases. Sham Singh Attariwala’s vow and white dress are told as Sikh tradition. Gough’s bayonet remark and his ‘could have wept’ letter are given as reported, not from the original documents. Polls are readers’ opinions, not findings.
Sources
- Wikipedia: First Anglo-Sikh War (citing Cunningham, Hernon, Jawandha and Sidhu)
- Wikipedia: Second Anglo-Sikh War
- Wikipedia: Battle of Ferozeshah
- Wikipedia: Battle of Chillianwala (citing Khushwant Singh and J.S. Grewal)
- Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Punjabi University: Lal Singh, Raja (d. 1866)
- Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Punjabi University: Cunningham, Joseph Davey (1812–1851)
- Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Punjabi University: Annexation of the Punjab
- Encyclopaedia of Sikhism, Punjabi University: Duleep Singh, Maharaja (1838–1893)
- Internet Archive: A History of the Sikhs, from the Origin of the Nation to the Battles of the Sutlej, Joseph Davey Cunningham (1849)
- Wikipedia: Jind Kaur (citing Khushwant Singh, Christy Campbell and B.J. Hasrat)
- Sikh Museum Initiative: Maharani Jindan Kaur: the queen with the ‘only manly understanding in the Punjab’
- Wikipedia: Sher Singh
- Wikipedia: Pashaura Singh
- Wikipedia: Jawahar Singh (wazir)
- Horniman Museum: Raja Jawahir Singh (object record)
- Wikipedia: Treaty of Amritsar (1846)
- Dawn: Punjab notes: Shah Muhammad’s Jang Hind Punjab, Mushtaq Soofi
- The Tribune: ‘Black Prince’ rekindles debate on Duleep Singh’s last rites, Ashish Ray
- Wikipedia: Sham Singh Attariwala
PromotedSaga of the KharkusPrem DhillonListenPaid placement · Promote your song
All history · History of the Sikhs · History of Punjab · History of India